GWERU: The City of Gweru says it plans to fund-raise over US$100 000 for the establishment of a new a dumpsite, further delaying the decommissioning of McFaden landfill, which has become Midlands provincial capital’s major health hazard.
McFaden Landfill, popularly known to the public as the ‘Gweru Dumpsite’, is situated in the southwest of Gweru’s central business district (CBD).
The landfill, which is approximately 10km from the CBD, is, however, a few metres from Woodlands Phase 2 suburb and it continues to be the single largest environmental health risk to more than 15 000 people residing in the high-density suburb.
Residents around the dumpsite have been putting pressure on local authorities to speedily decommission the landfill.
Investigations we carried out last month in conjunction with Information for Development Trust — a non-profit organisation that promotes investigative reporting — revealed that after years of bickering and finger-pointing, Vungu Rural District Council and City of Gweru finally signed a Memorandum of Agreement in February 2021 to solve problems faced by Woodlands residents, one of which was the removal of the landfill.
It was agreed that the relocation would be completed within three years from the date of signing the agreement.
However, new information shows that City of Gweru is failing to meet the ballooning cost of moving the dumpsite to the new dumpsite, Starr Shire landfill, measuring 11 hectares, also 10km from the CBD.
The initial cost of the relocation was estimated at ZW$2 million in 2020.
City of Gweru health director Sam Sekenhamo said in an interview the whole process was likely to cost more than US$100 000.
“Figures have changed. Costs have risen because the price of fuel is not what it was then. There are also additional costs to consider for things that include compaction, weighbridges, security fences, and water sample wells,” he said.
“It is quite a process as we want to meet required standards. Everything to be done will cost more than US$100 000. When we start the process, we will concurrently be removing the waste at the old dumpsite while at the same time constructing the new dumpsite.”
Council spokesperson Vimbai Chingwaramuse, however, said the municipality was planning events to raise funds for the dumpsite relocation project.
“We are currently mobilising funds to move the old dumpsite to the new site. Currently, we don’t have the funds for the project,” she said.
“As for fundraising, we are looking at establishing partnerships. We hope these will give us positive results.”
Gweru residents have questioned the local authority’s commitment to decommissioning the landfill, which continues to pose a major health risk to families in Woodlands Phase 2 high-density suburb.
The residents have filed numerous complaints about the bad odour from the dumpsite, uncontrollable flies, and rodents getting into their houses.
Also of great concern to the residents is the contamination of the borehole water in the area, which poses a serious threat to their health.
Woodlands Ward Development Committee member Matilda Hanada said: “The announcement by the council that they had found a new landfill was great news but the slow pace of implementation is now a major worry.
“We have not received any updates and when we ask for information from their offices, we don’t get anything.
“We are now confused and very unhappy. The area is not being serviced, garbage is not being collected, which has compounded the problem,” she said.
Gweru Residents and Ratepayers Association Programmes Officer Fadzayi Kanyai also expressed dismay at the municipality’s lackadaisical approach to the issue.
“We are not happy with the pace with which the council is dealing with the dumpsite issue. To them it’s not an urgent matter,” she said.
“So far it is all on paper. We thought since they had agreed to decommission the dumpsite, the dumping of rubbish by refuse trucks would also stop.”
Environmentalist Moses Ziyambi, who is the director at EnviroPress, lamented how regulatory authorities, like the Environmental Management Agency (Ema), have not moved in to shut down the landfill.
“Having noted engineering irregularities in the landfill, and having noted that the place had become an environmental disaster, it was pertinent for Ema to deploy its enforcement department to make sure that the place was closed without further delays,” he said.
“Unfortunately this did not happen. It’s not enough to compile a report and then fold your hands.
“It is also important to ensure that requisite EIA (environmental impact assessment) processes are strictly followed when building a new landfill at the identified site. We should ensure that there is no repeat of building a landfill on a wetland,” Ziyambi said.
The Ema warned the city council in February last year against developing a new suburb close to McFaden Landfill.
During the EIA stakeholder consultation meeting that was held on February 24, 2021, the city council indicated that “…it is no longer best to continue having the dumpsite at McFadden Farm since it is now surrounded by residential areas and residents are constantly being affected by flies which are vectors for diseases, smoke from fires and unpleasant smell from the dumpsite”.
Acknowledging that EMA has not received any communication from the City of Gweru as yet, the regulator’s spokesperson for Midlands Oswald Ndlovu said they were in constant communication with the City of Gweru to ensure that they meet the set deadlines.
“We have not heard anything from the City of Gweru but remember council committed to having the dumpsite moved within three years and pave way for the construction of Mkoba 21,” he said.
“It is such deadlines we continue chasing so that compliance issues are kept on check.”
The decommissioning of McFaden has become urgent after the City of Gweru announced plans to partner a developer, Shesham Investments in developing Mkoba 21, near the landfill.
- This investigation was first published in Zimbabwe Independent and produced in partnership with IMS and FOJO